I would like to send you an outline of a Political Project I’ve been working on for several months that addresses "A Broad Progressive Platform For 2026 and 2028", that I believe, given our current bifurcated population, the 2026/2028 project would be favorably looked upon by a significant portion of the American population.
It was largely prompted/guided when I learned of the "National Partnership for Reinventing Government (NPR)" that Al Gore worked on while Vice President. Sound Familiar??? Except “The “NPR” was Ethical, Logical and HONEST IN ITS GOALS!
I believe a 'Renewed NPR Effort Like Program' could bring about “The/A Rebirth Of THE/AN ‘AMERICAN 21ST Century” and the beginning of “The Next/New Generation Of Open, Fair And Progressive US Government”!!
Synopsis Follows - "Proposal: "Independent National Strategy Agency (INSA)".
Objective: Establish a nonpartisan, multidisciplinary agency to oversee and guide national strategy across key sectors—military, education, health, transportation, energy, technology AND TAXATION AND SPENDING—ensuring optimized, evidence-based, and economically sound decision-making.
Key Features:
Mandatory Participation: Private corporations and governmental agencies contribute research, data, and expertise to ensure a holistic approach to national planning.
Independent Oversight: Free from political and corporate influence, with safeguards ensuring impartiality in decision-making.
Expert-Led Decision Making: Comprised of scientists, economists, military strategists, engineers, technologists, and social policy experts, guaranteeing that national priorities are shaped by those with specialized knowledge.
Long-Term Planning vs. Short-Term Political Cycles: Focuses on decades-long sustainability and efficiency, avoiding reactionary policymaking driven by election cycles or corporate lobbying.
Efficient Allocation of Resources: Reduces wasteful spending by ensuring that national investments serve actual strategic needs rather than political or corporate interests.
Rationale: The U.S. faces increasing global and domestic challenges that demand foresight, innovation, and unity across sectors. Current processes often favor short-term, politically motivated decisions rather than strategic, long-term national growth. INSA would provide unbiased, science-driven leadership, eliminating inefficiencies and ensuring economic, military, and social stability through proactive planning.
Expected Benefits:
✅ Reduced bureaucratic and TAXATION AND SPENDING inefficiencies. ✅ Stronger technological and economic leadership in global markets. ✅ Enhanced defense strategies with forward-looking military innovation (e.g., drones vs. traditional systems).
✅ Optimized energy policies for sustainability and national independence. ✅ Improved education and workforce development, ensuring long-term economic strength.
(This proposal could spark real discussion among policymakers, industry leaders, and academics.)
Chuck, I don’t want to burst your bubble but we are stuck with the two party system not only because of your pointing out that ballot access in the 50 states is based on the two parties but because if an idea becomes popular enough it will be confiscated by one of the two dominate parties. We have seen this occur again and again. Remember the American Party of 1968 where the great George Wallace campaigned for President. Likewise more recently we had Ross Perot in 1992. Chuck parties evolve, the Democrats of today are not the party of the great senators of the 1950’s and 1960’s that dominated southern politics and the Senate. Just like the Republican Party are not the party of the great Senators from New England when it was a reliable Republican region. Today’s Democratic Party is evolving into a party of Socialists Marxist, we will just have to see where it goes.
I would like to send you an outline of a Political Project I’ve been working on for several months that addresses "A Broad Progressive Platform For 2026 and 2028", that I believe, given our current bifurcated population, the 2026/2028 project would be favorably looked upon by a significant portion of the American population.
It was largely prompted/guided when I learned of the "National Partnership for Reinventing Government (NPR)" that Al Gore worked on while Vice President. Sound Familiar??? Except “The “NPR” was Ethical, Logical and HONEST IN ITS GOALS!
I believe a 'Renewed NPR Effort Like Program' could bring about “The/A Rebirth Of THE/AN ‘AMERICAN 21ST Century” and the beginning of “The Next/New Generation Of Open, Fair And Progressive US Government”!!
Synopsis Follows - "Proposal: "Independent National Strategy Agency (INSA)".
Objective: Establish a nonpartisan, multidisciplinary agency to oversee and guide national strategy across key sectors—military, education, health, transportation, energy, technology AND TAXATION AND SPENDING—ensuring optimized, evidence-based, and economically sound decision-making.
Key Features:
Mandatory Participation: Private corporations and governmental agencies contribute research, data, and expertise to ensure a holistic approach to national planning.
Independent Oversight: Free from political and corporate influence, with safeguards ensuring impartiality in decision-making.
Expert-Led Decision Making: Comprised of scientists, economists, military strategists, engineers, technologists, and social policy experts, guaranteeing that national priorities are shaped by those with specialized knowledge.
Long-Term Planning vs. Short-Term Political Cycles: Focuses on decades-long sustainability and efficiency, avoiding reactionary policymaking driven by election cycles or corporate lobbying.
Efficient Allocation of Resources: Reduces wasteful spending by ensuring that national investments serve actual strategic needs rather than political or corporate interests.
Rationale: The U.S. faces increasing global and domestic challenges that demand foresight, innovation, and unity across sectors. Current processes often favor short-term, politically motivated decisions rather than strategic, long-term national growth. INSA would provide unbiased, science-driven leadership, eliminating inefficiencies and ensuring economic, military, and social stability through proactive planning.
Expected Benefits:
✅ Reduced bureaucratic and TAXATION AND SPENDING inefficiencies. ✅ Stronger technological and economic leadership in global markets. ✅ Enhanced defense strategies with forward-looking military innovation (e.g., drones vs. traditional systems).
✅ Optimized energy policies for sustainability and national independence. ✅ Improved education and workforce development, ensuring long-term economic strength.
(This proposal could spark real discussion among policymakers, industry leaders, and academics.)
I anxiously await your thoughts.
Best Regards
Jim Challender
5004 Arbor Chase Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27616
Cell 954-551-9200
Email JimChallender@Hotmail.com
Chuck, I don’t want to burst your bubble but we are stuck with the two party system not only because of your pointing out that ballot access in the 50 states is based on the two parties but because if an idea becomes popular enough it will be confiscated by one of the two dominate parties. We have seen this occur again and again. Remember the American Party of 1968 where the great George Wallace campaigned for President. Likewise more recently we had Ross Perot in 1992. Chuck parties evolve, the Democrats of today are not the party of the great senators of the 1950’s and 1960’s that dominated southern politics and the Senate. Just like the Republican Party are not the party of the great Senators from New England when it was a reliable Republican region. Today’s Democratic Party is evolving into a party of Socialists Marxist, we will just have to see where it goes.